Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393365›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Assessment of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and enamel matrix derivative as direct pulp-capping agents.

Shivali Vaid, Ankitha Ade, Abhishek Mishra, Bonny Paul, Kavita Dube, Rishav Singh, Sanapala Mounika, Megha Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shivali VaidDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Pathology & Microbiology, MaharanaPratap College of Dentistry & Research Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ankitha AdeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Elite Dental Clinic and Maxillofacial Center, Ongole, India.
Abhishek MishraDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, ITS Dental College, Greater Noida, India.
Bonny PaulDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hitkarini Dental College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Kavita DubeDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hitkarini Dental College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rishav SinghDepartment of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College & Research Centre, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India.
Sanapala MounikaIntern, Kalinga Institute of Dental Science, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Megha GhoshDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Rau, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, Indore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservative pulp treatments are used to maintain the tooth's vitality. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the clinical, radiographic and histologic responses of the pulp-dentin complex after direct capping with the MTA, Biodentine and Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD) in human permanent teeth. A sterile rotary round bur was used to mechanically expose the pulps of 36 premolars that were advised for extraction. The teeth were then divided to one of three experimental groups: MTA, Biodentine and Enamel Matrix Derivative (EMD). The creation of the dentine bridge was evaluated using radiographs and histology. Clinically absence of signs symptoms was noted. MTA had the highest dentine bridge formation, followed by biodentine and EMD.

Indexed as

Biodentinedirect pulp cappingenamel matrix derivative (EMD)histologyMTApulpal reaction

Identifiers

PMID41393365
PMCPMC12697513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.