Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393342›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

CORGIAS: identifying correlated gene pairs by considering evolutionary history in a large-scale prokaryotic genome dataset.

Yuki Nishimura, Kimiho Omae, Kento Tominaga, Wataru Iwasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuki NishimuraDepartment of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-0882, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7990-1316
Kimiho OmaeDepartment of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-0882, Japan.
Kento TominagaDepartment of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-0882, Japan.
Wataru IwasakiDepartment of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Chiba 277-0882, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent expansion of prokaryotic genomes reveals many ortholog groups (OGs) whose function cannot be inferred from conventional, sequence similarity-based annotation methods, especially in metagenome-assembled genomes. Phylogenetic profiling is one of the promising methods to annotate these OGs, by identifying functional relationships of OGs using co- or anti-occurrence of OG distributions, not sequence similarity. Here, we proposed two new phylogenetic methods for large-scale data, Ancestral State Adjustment (ASA) and Simultaneous EVolution test (SEV), which consider the ancestral state of OG presence/absence. In evaluations using three distinct prokaryotic datasets, ASA and SEV showed better or comparable performance to both established and recently proposed methods for large-scale data. We compared the functionally related OGs detected by each method and found that SEV and its predecessor can identify slowly evolving OGs, such as housekeeping genes. In contrast, ASA and its predecessors can detect functionally related OGs that tend to be gained or lost in a fixed order, indicating a strong evolutionary constraint that provides clues for functional prediction. Using matrix multiplication, we also showed that SEV is scalable in the latest genome databases.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialDatabases, GeneticPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID41393342
PMCPMC12699329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.