Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393318›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Differences in external loads of different pitch types in Chinese male college baseball players.

Shenglei Qin, Dingmeng Ren, Zheng Li, Bo Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shenglei QinChina Football College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Dingmeng RenChina Football College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Zheng LiChina Football College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Bo ZhangChina Football College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In baseball, monitoring player load solely through pitch count and innings overlooks the variability introduced by different pitch types. This study analyzed differences in external load, measured as Player Load, across various pitch types using a GPS-based wearable device. Additionally, the relationship between Player Load and ball velocity was examined. Methods: Data from 320 baseball pitches were collected for experimental analysis. External loads were collected for four pitch types, fastball, changeup, curveball, and slider, using a wearable sensor device that recorded six variables: Maximum Player Load (Max PL), Maximum Rotation (Max Rot), Pitching Hourly Velocity, and Percentage of Acceleration Change in the Three Axes (Up Load %, Side Load %, and Fwd Load %). A one-way ANOVA test was used to assess differences across pitch types, while stepwise multiple regression analyzed the impact of Player Load on pitching speed. Results: Significant differences were observed among pitch types for Max PL, Max Rot, Hourly Speed, Up Load %, and Fwd Load % ( Discussion: External training loads in pitching vary by pitch type, with variable-speed pitches generating higher peak external loads, whereas fastballs are associated with greater ball speeds.

Indexed as

baseballexternal loadload monitorpitch typeplayer load

Identifiers

PMID41393318
PMCPMC12695764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.