ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To present our experiences with Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study enrolling patients with CF. Patients were categorized into low- (~500 mL/d), moderate- (500-1000 mL/d), and high-output (>1000 mL/d) groups. The primary outcomes were the efficacy and safety of PAI. Results: A total of 95 patients were included. Among them, eight with low-output CF, five with moderate-output CF, and 15 with high-output CF underwent PAI. Following PAI, a significant reduction in drainage volume was observed, resulting in the removal of 92.9% of drainage tubes by the third day post-treatment. Fever and pain of varying intensity were common adverse effects immediately after PAI. However, by the third day, no patients had a fever, and no moderate or severe pain was reported. Based on our findings, we propose that initial CF management should be stratified by drainage output. The majority of cases were effectively resolved using PAI and other non-surgical interventions, with reoperation reserved only for when conservative treatments failed. Conclusion: PAI proved effective in resolving CF after unsuccessful prior non-surgical interventions following thyroid surgery, with minimal complications. Management of CF requires a tiered approach based on output levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.