ArticleRadiologia brasileira
Assessment of microvascular flow by Doppler in prostate biopsy: correlation with the Gleason score.
Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Next steps for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy - where microvascular flow imaging plays a role.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the degree of microvascular flow on Doppler ultrasound correlates with the aggressiveness of prostate cancer, as defined by the Gleason score. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study including 88 patients evaluated between November 2023 and July 2024. We included men between 48 and 85 years of age with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level between 0.3 ng/mL and 21.0 ng/mL and an imaging finding with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category between 2 and 5. Patients with indeterminate biopsy results were excluded, as were those for whom PSA values were missing, those who did not undergo microvascular Doppler assessment, and those previously diagnosed with prostate cancer. In each case, we performed systematic 10-core transrectal biopsy, guided by 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion, as well as performing Doppler ultrasound with microvascular flow imaging. Vascularization was qualitatively assessed and categorized as absent/minimal, moderate, or marked. The Gleason score was classified as clinically significant (≥ 7) or not (≤ 6).. Results: A significant association was found between the degree of microvascular flow and the Gleason score ( Conclusion: Microvascular Doppler shows potential as a complementary tool in prostate biopsy, enabling more precise targeting of regions with increased vascularity, which might be associated with greater tumor aggressiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.