Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393236›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Leveraging data augmentation for machine learning models in predicting depression and anxiety using the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale clinical reports.

Saleha Noor, Zamir Hussain, Qurrat Ulain Hamdan, Mehwish Zaman, Rehan Zafar Paracha, Syeda Aneela Zahra Shamsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saleha NoorSchool of Interdisciplinary Engineering and Sciences (SINES), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Zamir HussainSchool of Interdisciplinary Engineering and Sciences (SINES), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Qurrat Ulain HamdanInstitute of Psychiatry, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Mehwish ZamanDepartment of Statistical Science, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Rehan Zafar ParachaRiphah Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Syeda Aneela Zahra ShamsiSchool of Interdisciplinary Engineering and Sciences (SINES), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: An estimated 15 million people are affected by depression and anxiety in Pakistan. However, there are relatively few government mental health facilities and certified psychiatrists. This highlights the need for efficient assessments to implement intervention strategies and address these challenges. This study aims to utilize machine learning with RCADS to maximize the use of current healthcare resources and facilitate depression and anxiety screening. Methods: The dataset include 138 cases, with 89 retained after cleaning along 47 RCADS-items as features. Based on RCADS-47 T-scores, cases were classified as normal, borderline and clinical, with 7% in the borderline, 55% in normal and 38% in clinical range. Three feature selection methods - the Chi-square test of independence, Spearman's correlation, and Random Forest-Recursive Feature Elimination were performed. Data augmentation was done using the probability distribution of the existing data to generate hybrid-synthetic correlated discrete multinomial variants of each item of RCADS. Six commonly employed ML algorithms, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighbor, were trained on the original dataset and the top three best models were then evaluated on augmented datasets and the best among them, further validated on external dataset. Results: Item 05 of the RCADS has a weak correlation with the evaluation of depression and anxiety in the study population. Data augmented to forth time its original size was determined to be the optimal ratio for our dataset as Random Forest yielded the best overall results with up to 81% macro average accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score when tested on this data. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the Random Forest algorithm using 46 features suits the data well and has the potential to be further developed as a decision support system for the concerned professionals and improve the usual way of screening anxiety and depression in children and adolescents.

Indexed as

anxietydata augmentationdepressionmachine learning algorithmsRevised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)

Identifiers

PMID41393236
PMCPMC12696576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.