Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393214›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

Positive preoperative urine culture is a predictor of urinary tract infections and fever following suction mini-PCNL: results from a large, multicenter series from the Endourology section of the European Association of Urology and the STUMPS collaborative group.

Angelo Cormio, Daniele Castellani, Bhaskar K Somani, Khi Yung Fong, Nitesh Kumar, Rajiv H Kalbit, Ivan Gorgotsky, Sundaram Palaniappan, Yiloren Tanidir, Zelimkhan Tokhtiyev and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Angelo CormioDepartment of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6897-7040
Daniele CastellaniEndourology Section of the European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-9190
Bhaskar K SomaniEndourology Section of the European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478
Khi Yung FongDepartment of Urology, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Nitesh KumarDepartment of Urology, Ford Hospital and Research Centre, Patna, Bihar, India.
Rajiv H KalbitDepartment of Urology, Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center, Manila, Philippines.
Ivan GorgotskyDepartment of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Sundaram PalaniappanDepartment of Urology, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yiloren TanidirDepartment of Urology, Medicana Atasehir Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zelimkhan TokhtiyevDepartment of Urology and Andrology, IPPE of A.I. Burnazyan SSC FMBC, FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Lazaros TzelvesSecond Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4619-9783
Andreas SkolarikosEndourology Section of the European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Esteban AcuñaDepartment of Urology, Institution Hospital Provincial de Ovalle, Ovalle, Coquimbo, Chile.
Leonardo Gomes LopesDepartment of Urology, Hospital Orizonti and Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Dmitriy GorelovDepartment of Urology, First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Jaisukh KalathiaFortune Urology Clinic, Botad, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2194-3804
Amish MehtaB T Savani Kidney Hospital, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Karl TanDepartment of Urology, Veterans Memorial Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Pankaj DholariaB T Savani Kidney Hospital, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Arun ChawlaUrology and Renal Transplant Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Edgar Beltrán-SuárezDepartment of Urology, Specialty Hospital La Raza, National Medical Center of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico.
Zhu WeiDepartment of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Thomas R W HerrmannEndourology section of the European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Steffi Kar-Kei YuenEndourology Section of the European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-1558
Vineet GauharEndourology Section of the European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-7141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical utility of preoperative mid-stream urine culture (MSUC) in predicting fever and urinary tract infections (UTIs) after suction-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SM-PCNL) remains debated. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the correlation of postoperative fever and UTIs following SM-PCNL in patients with a positive preoperative MSUC versus those with a negative culture. Design: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected registry including 693 patients from the international STUMPS registry (30 centers and 21 countries). Methods: Patients were stratified by preoperative MSUC results. All positive cultures were treated with targeted antibiotics for ⩾5 days as per the antibiogram; repeated negative cultures before surgery were not mandatory. Intraoperative parameters, 30-day postoperative complications, and stone-free rates (SFR) were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess independent predictors of infectious complications. Results: Clavien-Dindo grade 1 postoperative fever occurred in 10.6% of patients with positive MSUC versus 4.6% in those with negative cultures. Clavien-Dindo grade 2 infections were more frequent in MSUC-positive patients (4.9% vs 1.2%). Sepsis requiring intensive care occurred in one patient per group. There was no difference in stone compositions and equivalent distribution of infectious stones in both. Intraoperative pelvic urine cultures were more frequently positive in patients with positive MSUC (5.7% vs 0.9%, Conclusion: Positive preoperative MSUC is independently associated with a higher risk of postoperative fever and UTIs, particularly Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2 events, following SM-PCNL. Furthermore, these patients are more likely to have a positive intraoperative urine culture. Therefore, a preoperative MSUC should always be obtained, and a targeted antibiotic therapy should be administered irrespective of stone composition to reduce postoperative infectious risk.

Indexed as

kidney calculilaserpercutaneous nephrolithotomysheathsuctionurine culture

Identifiers

PMID41393214
PMCPMC12696280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.