Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393171›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2025

RGB-Based Deep Learning for Freeze Damage Detection in Strawberry: Comparing Scratch and Transfer Learning Approaches on Custom Data.

Nijhum Paul, G C Sunil, Amin Khan, Samriddha Das, Harlene Hatterman-Valenti, James V Anderson, Jinita Stapit Kandel, David Horvath, Xin Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nijhum PaulDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USA.
G C SunilDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USA.
Amin KhanDepartment of Plant Sciences North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USA.
Samriddha DasDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USA.
Harlene Hatterman-ValentiDepartment of Plant Sciences North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8416-4800
James V AndersonUSDA-ARS-ETSARC Weed and Insect Biology Research Unit Fargo North Dakota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1801-5767
Jinita Stapit KandelUSDA-ARS-ETSARC Weed and Insect Biology Research Unit Fargo North Dakota USA.
David HorvathUSDA-ARS-ETSARC Weed and Insect Biology Research Unit Fargo North Dakota USA.
Xin SunDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering North Dakota State University Fargo North Dakota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0658-7522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freeze damage presents a critical threat to agricultural productivity, resulting in substantial economic losses, especially in sensitive crops such as strawberries. Traditional methods for assessing freeze damage, including manual inspection, are time-consuming, subjective, and labor-intensive. In this study, a deep learning (DL) and computer vision-based approach was proposed to automate freeze damage classification in strawberry plants using RGB images. The performance of four convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures was evaluated: DenseNet-121, Inception V3, ResNet-50, and Xception. Two training methods are compared: transfer learning (TL) using pretrained ImageNet weights and training models from scratch. The models are assessed based on classification accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and inference time. The results indicate that models trained from scratch outperform TL models, achieving up to 97% accuracy with ResNet-50, whereas TL models attained a maximum accuracy of 84%. The ResNet-50 model also achieved the fastest inference time (3.0 s) while DenseNet-121 was the smallest (26. 86 MB). Furthermore, the models were most effective at identifying severely damaged plants but struggled to differentiate mild damage from minimal or no damage. The findings suggest that scratch-trained models deliver more accurate solutions for freeze damage classification in strawberry plants. Additionally, DenseNet-121 was the best choice for memory-limited applications, while ResNet-50 excelled in speed-sensitive tasks. This study underscores the potential of deep learning and computer vision to automate freeze damage assessment in strawberry plants, providing a more accurate, rapid, and nondestructive alternative to traditional methods.

Indexed as

CNNcomputer visiondeep learningfreeze damageplant stressRGBtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41393171
PMCPMC12696421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.