ArticlePlant direct2025
RGB-Based Deep Learning for Freeze Damage Detection in Strawberry: Comparing Scratch and Transfer Learning Approaches on Custom Data.
Article in Plant direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multispectral Fluorescence Imaging for Fast Identification of Cold Stress in Pepper Plants.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- RGB-Based Deep Learning for Freeze Damage Detection in Strawberry: Comparing Scratch and Transfer Learning Approaches on Custom Data.Plant direct · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freeze damage presents a critical threat to agricultural productivity, resulting in substantial economic losses, especially in sensitive crops such as strawberries. Traditional methods for assessing freeze damage, including manual inspection, are time-consuming, subjective, and labor-intensive. In this study, a deep learning (DL) and computer vision-based approach was proposed to automate freeze damage classification in strawberry plants using RGB images. The performance of four convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures was evaluated: DenseNet-121, Inception V3, ResNet-50, and Xception. Two training methods are compared: transfer learning (TL) using pretrained ImageNet weights and training models from scratch. The models are assessed based on classification accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and inference time. The results indicate that models trained from scratch outperform TL models, achieving up to 97% accuracy with ResNet-50, whereas TL models attained a maximum accuracy of 84%. The ResNet-50 model also achieved the fastest inference time (3.0 s) while DenseNet-121 was the smallest (26. 86 MB). Furthermore, the models were most effective at identifying severely damaged plants but struggled to differentiate mild damage from minimal or no damage. The findings suggest that scratch-trained models deliver more accurate solutions for freeze damage classification in strawberry plants. Additionally, DenseNet-121 was the best choice for memory-limited applications, while ResNet-50 excelled in speed-sensitive tasks. This study underscores the potential of deep learning and computer vision to automate freeze damage assessment in strawberry plants, providing a more accurate, rapid, and nondestructive alternative to traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.