Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393150›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Targeted

Sajjad Sadeghpour, Ramin Sadeghi, Atena Aghaee, Amin Saber Tanha, Alessio Rizzo, Giorgio Treglia, Saba Sadeghpour

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sajjad SadeghpourNuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ramin SadeghiNuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Atena AghaeeNuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Amin Saber TanhaNuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Alessio RizzoNuclear Medicine Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy.
Giorgio TregliaFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Saba SadeghpourMadani Hospital, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-melanoma skin cancer is the most prevalent malignancy. Primary treatments may at times yield suboptimal results. In these cases, alternative therapies or the combination of different modalities may be required to achieve complete removal and prevent the risk of recurrence. Methods: We examined studies published up to July 2025 using databases such as PubMed and Scopus, focusing on the performance of rhenium-assisted therapies with respect to therapeutic efficacy and potential adverse effects. Studies investigating the therapeutic outcomes of rhenium-assisted therapies for cutaneous lesions were considered. The primary endpoint was the response rate to rhenium-assisted therapies. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 10 studies involving 433 patients and more than 618 lesions. Of these, seven studies were included in the meta-analysis, in which rhenium-assisted therapy achieved a complete response rate of 88.67%(95% CI: 84.7-91.7%) and an overall response rate of 92.9% (95% CI: 89.1-95.5%). A leave-one-out analysis was performed to assess the study's impact on heterogeneity, revealing that one study markedly influenced the pooled effect. By excluding this outlier, heterogeneity was substantially reduced, while the overall mean effect remained significant (complete response 94, 95% CI [90, 96%]; overall response 97, 95% CI [92, 99%]). Conclusion: Rhenium-assisted therapy for skin cancer appears effective and safe in treating lesions unresponsive to standard options. It may represent a valuable tool, providing advantages over conventional approaches. Further studies are warranted to confirm its efficacy and establish standardized protocols.

Indexed as

cutaneous lesionnon-melanoma skin cancerresinrheniumskin cancerskin cancer therapysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41393150
PMCPMC12695840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.