ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A deep learning-driven cataract screening model derived from multicenter real-world dataset.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transfer learning and vision transformer for the automatic diagnosis of cataracts in ophthalmological images.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cataracts, the leading cause of reversible blindness globally, require timely detection and intervention for effective prevention of blindness. Artificial intelligence can assist in massive screening, however, existing models often trained on homogeneous, single-center data, suer from poor generalizability. Methods: To address this challenge, we developed and validated a deep learning model trained on a large-scale, multicenter, real-world dataset comprising 22,094 slit-lamp images from 21 ophthalmic institutions across 12 provinces and municipalities in China. We designed a cascaded framework that emulates the sequential reasoning of a clinical diagnostic workflow, a methodological approach for ensuring reliability on noisy, real-world data. It first performs an automated quality assessment, then screens for common confounders like pterygium, and finally conducts a differential diagnosis among cataract, post-cataract surgery, other ocular diseases, and healthy eyes. Within this framework, we evaluated several deep learning architectures. Results: In the cataract classification task, the leading models demonstrated excellent performance on an independent test set. For instance, the ResNet50-IBN based model achieved an accuracy of 93.74%, specificity of 97.74% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 95.30%. Discussion: This study demonstrates that training on multicenter, real-world data yields a robust and generalizable model, providing a powerful tool for largescale ophthalmic screening. Specifically, our model establishes a methodological blueprint for developing trustworthy medical deep learning systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.