ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Robotic-assisted surgery in benign gynecology: single-center experience with 106 patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Robotic-assisted surgery is increasingly used in gynecology, offering technological and ergonomic benefits that overcome the limitations of traditional laparoscopy. This retrospective study evaluates perioperative outcomes, learning curve, and feasibility of robotic-assisted surgery for benign gynecological indications using the Da Vinci Xi Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical) at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Frauenzentrum Bern, Lindenhofspital AG, Switzerland. Methods: Between August 2021 and November 2024, 106 consecutive patients underwent robotic-assisted surgery for various benign gynecological conditions. Clinical and perioperative outcomes were assessed. To evaluate the learning curve, the cohort was divided chronologically into two equal groups (first 53 and subsequent 53 cases). Differences between groups were analysed using multivariate logistic regression. The impact of potential predictors on total operation time was assessed using multivariate linear regression (significance level: Results: All cases were successfully completed robotically without conversion to laparotomy. No serious adverse events occurred. Logistic regression showed significant differences between the two groups in a 0.008-times heavier uterine weight (Confidence Intervals (CI) 0.003-0.014; Conclusion: Robotic-assisted surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopy in benign gynecology. The learning curve was demonstrated by reduced console time and fewer incisions in later cases, despite higher BMI and uterine weight. Further studies should assess patient benefits and cost-effectiveness compared to conventional laparoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.