ArticleJournal of blood medicine2025
Moving Toward Collecting High-Quality Umbilical Cord Blood: Application of Quality Control Circle.
Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: All umbilical cord blood (UCB) used for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) must pass through a series of strict tests, including volume, total nucleated cell count, microbial contamination, hematopoietic stem cells content, and activity. A strictly standardizing collection procedures for UCB within hospitals is a critical step in preserving hematopoietic stem cells resources. Methods: The study included a total of 560 participants, with 337 in the control group and 223 in the observation group, collected from January 2022 to December 2024. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups. The UCB collected from newborns before the initiation of Quality Control Circle (QCC) activities served as the control group, whereas those collected after the initiation of QCC activities formed the observation group. Through the establishment of QCC nursing management, the reasons for UCB storage failures within the department were analyzed, and corresponding countermeasures were formulated. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the reasons for failure of UCB storage, success rate, and quality indicators of successfully stored UCB between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the general clinical data of the newborns between the two groups. After the implementation of QCC activities, the rate of successfully stored UCB samples in the observation group was 90.6%, which was significantly higher than that of 84.3% in the control group ( Conclusion: The implementation of QCC in UCB collection increased the success rate by 6.3 percentage points without compromising cellular quality, supporting its application as a continuous improvement strategy in obstetric settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.