Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393036›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Comprehensive meta-analysis of emergency trauma outcomes: trends, interventions, and survival rates.

Aiming Li, Qiaoyan Feng, Ye Zhao, Xianhuan Zhang, Weijie Jiang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patient-reported outcome measures within European cohorts of severely injured patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Significant other reported outcome measures within European cohorts of severely injured patients: A systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aiming LiDepartment of Emergency, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qiaoyan FengDepartment of Emergency, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ye ZhaoDepartment of Emergency, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xianhuan ZhangDepartment of Emergency, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Weijie JiangDepartment of Emergency, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Trauma remains one of the leading global health challenges, with morbidity and mortality disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). While high-income nations have reported improved outcomes through the implementation of structured trauma systems, LMICs continue to bear the greatest burden of trauma-related deaths. Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the influence of trauma centers and organized trauma systems on reducing mortality among patients with traumatic injuries, irrespective of age, region, or mechanism of injury. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted of peer-reviewed studies published between January 2010 and December 2022, retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included all age groups and trauma types, comparing outcomes between trauma centers/systems versus non-trauma settings, as well as pre- and post-implementation periods of trauma systems. Data were synthesized using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Group A (trauma centers/systems vs. non-trauma centers/systems) reported a reduced mortality risk associated with organized trauma care (RR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34; I Conclusion: Evidence supports the role of trauma centers and systems in significantly improving survival among trauma patients. However, persistent disparities remain, especially in LMICs and rural areas. Future research should emphasize long-term patient outcomes and strategies to reduce inequities in trauma care delivery.

Indexed as

Trauma CentersWounds and InjuriesDeveloping CountriesHumansSurvival Ratemeta-analysismorbiditymortalitysurvival outcomestraumatrauma systems

Identifiers

PMID41393036
PMCPMC12695774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.