Observational studyFrontiers in public health2025
Data-driven identification of metabolic and cardiovascular biomarkers in high-altitude workers: a machine learning approach.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Workers in high-altitude mining settings face increased cardiometabolic risk due to chronic exposure to low oxygen levels. Traditional fitness-for-work (FFW) assessments often evaluate biomarkers in isolation, missing relevant health patterns. Aim: To improve the risk stratification of the FFW status in high-altitude workers by identifying relevant biomarkers through ML models. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 420,966 preemployment examination records, corresponding to 89,149 workers between 2021 and 2024 was analyzed. Workers were classified as fit or unfit for work, in each of their medical examinations, according to national guidelines. Several supervised ML models were applied, including random forests (RF), support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, and decision trees, to identify relevant predictors of FFW. Logistic regression was performed to assess statistical associations between biomarkers and fitness outcomes. Results: Among the 420,966 preemployment examination records, 48,783 were particularly assessed for fitness for high-altitude work. Among these, 8% were classified as unfit for high-altitude work. Significant predictors included body mass index (BMI), blood glucose, triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure. The Random Forest (RF) model outperformed SVM and KNN, achieving the highest predictive performance with an accuracy of 0.89, sensitivity of 0.92, and specificity of 0.83. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed BMI as the strongest predictor (OR 2.640, Conclusion: ML models can effectively identify critical health indicators related to FFW in high-altitude environments. These tools offer the potential to improve occupational health assessments and support preventive decision making in vulnerable worker populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.