ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Postoperative recurrence prediction model for perianal abscess using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a SHAP-interpretable GBM model for predicting postoperative recurrence of anal Fistula.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based model to predict recurrence risk after perianal abscess surgery, thereby supporting personalized follow-up and intervention strategies. Methods: Clinical data were collected from patients with perianal abscess who underwent surgery at Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine between January 2022 and June 2023. Significant predictors were identified using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm combined with multivariate logistic regression. The Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to balance class distribution, and several machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed for model construction. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Model calibration was assessed using calibration curves. The effectiveness was evaluated through Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Finally, the SHapley Additive ExPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret the best-performing model and quantify the contribution of each predictor to its predictions. Results: A total of 737 patients with perianal abscess were included in the study. A history of diabetes, abscess space, and the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) were identified as the three strongest predictors of recurrence. Among all evaluated models, the CatBoost model showed the highest discriminatory power in the training set (AUC = 0.821, 95% Conclusion: The machine learning-based model effectively identifies patients at high risk of recurrence after perianal abscess surgery. The CatBoost model achieved the best predictive performance, while SHAP analysis enhanced interpretability, supporting individualized patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.