ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2025
A comparison of the minimally invasive and traditional lateral approaches for hemiarthroplasty following a femoral neck fracture shows reduced postoperative pain and fewer blood transfusions.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the effects of the minimally invasive direct lateral approach, performed using standard hip surgery instruments, on operation duration, early postoperative pain, postoperative blood loss, and hospital stay in the treatment of femoral neck fractures with hemiarthroplasty (HA), compared with the standard Hardinge direct lateral approach (referred to in this study as the conventional group, CG).
methodsWe retrospectively collected clinical data from the medical records of our hospital. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of femoral neck fracture resulting from low-energy trauma and treatment with HA surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: the conventional group (CG) and the mini-incision group (MG). Twenty-four patients comprised the MG (case group), while 18 patients were in the CG (control group). The average wait time for surgery was 3.8 days for the MG and 3.6 days for the CG. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in postoperative pain scores, hospital stay, postoperative blood transfusion, operation duration, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels between the groups.
resultsThere was no significant difference in age or gender distribution between the case and control groups (p>0.05). The average age of the mini-incision group was 83.8 years, while the average age of the CG was 86.9 years. In both groups, the fracture types were equally distributed between Garden type III and IV. However, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores on the first and third postoperative days were significantly lower in the case group than in the CG (p<0.05). Patients in the MG required significantly fewer postoperative blood transfusions compared to the control group. Hospitalization duration, as well as hemoglobin and hematocrit levels both preoperatively and at discharge, were comparable between the groups.
conclusionThe data from this study indicate that the mini-incision technique is an effective and reliable method for treating femoral neck fractures. Compared with the conventional group, the minimally invasive direct lateral approach for femoral neck fractures significantly reduces early postoperative pain, results in less blood loss, offers better cosmetic outcomes, and maintains a similar length of hospital stay. Clinical studies with larger sample sizes and assessments of long-term postoperative outcomes are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.