ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Great Ape Childhoods: Social and Spatial Pathways to Independence in Bonobo and Chimpanzee Infants.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Great Ape Childhoods: Social and Spatial Pathways to Independence in Bonobo and Chimpanzee Infants.Developmental science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human development is marked by extended immaturity, necessitating extended care throughout infancy and childhood, facilitating advanced cognitive, social, and cultural skill acquisition. Parallels of extended development are also present in our closest living relatives, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), which differ markedly in their social systems. Bonobos live in more tolerant, female-bonded societies, while societies of chimpanzees are more hierarchical, and male-dominated. These differences in social ecology may thus also shape the pace and nature of early behavioural development. However, systematic, quantitative comparisons of developmental patterns of bonobos and chimpanzees are very limited, and results are conflicting. Hence, this study addressed this crucial gap by systematically examining behavioural development in bonobo and chimpanzee infants living in two populations (Kokolopori community, Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, DRC, N = 21; Ngogo community, Kibale National Park, Uganda, N = 22) in their natural environments. We specifically focused on infants aged 0-5.5 years and investigated behavioural markers of independence (travel, feeding, grooming) and spatial independence. Our results showed similar developmental trajectories but marked species differences concerning specific social and spatial patterns. While chimpanzee infants exhibited prolonged dorsal riding, bonobo infants travelled independently more often and maintained greater distances from their mothers. In addition, age, sibling presence and maternal parity, but not sex, influenced behavioural patterns. These findings highlight the importance of systematic comparative developmental research across great ape populations for understanding both species-specific adaptations and the broader evolutionary foundations of extended development in the human lineage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.