ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Evaluating Model-Based Extrapolation of Plasma Exposure for Long-Acting Injectable Products: From Single- to Multiple-Dose Trials.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generic Long-Acting Injectable Product Availability and Approval Standards.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- Evaluating Model-Based Extrapolation of Plasma Exposure for Long-Acting Injectable Products: From Single- to Multiple-Dose Trials.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-acting injectable medicinal products (LAIs) prolong drug release and thereby aim to enhance adherence and patient outcomes. European regulatory guidelines require the conduct of single- and multiple-dose trials to exclude differences in drug release between non-steady and steady state conditions. The complexity of these trials may however hamper the development of LAIs. This study aimed to examine whether drug release is different after single- and multiple-dose administration using clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data of a sample of five regulatory-approved LAIs. Single- and multiple-dose data were extracted from an internal regulatory database. Population pharmacokinetic models with different absorption structures were developed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling based on the single-dose data of every LAI. The best-fitting models were used to predict the pharmacokinetic profiles after multiple-dose administration. The absorption of LAIs after single-dose administration was best described with (parallel) first-order absorption structures (with and without lag-time). After multiple-dose administration, the mean model accuracy was 93% (minimum to maximum: 70%-122%), and 7 out of 10 observed pharmacokinetic variables (i.e., area under the plasma concentration-time curve, minimum and maximum concentration) met the pre-specified acceptance criteria. In conclusion, multiple-dose PK characteristics can be predicted using models developed from single-dose PK data, which indicates that drug release may not be very different between dosing conditions in this sample of regulatory-approved LAIs. Nevertheless, additional studies on other LAIs are required to test the generalizability of our findings and to increase our understanding of the limitations of the proposed model-based approach vis-à-vis the current evidentiary standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.