ArticleJournal of dental education2026
Educational Impact and Perceptions of Dental Students on a Simulated Patient Protocol at the Start of Their Clinical Practice: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Journal of dental education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSimulated patients in dental education are increasingly being adopted to help bridge the gap between preclinical learning and clinical practice. They develop essential clinical and communication skills in a controlled environment, boosting students' confidence and practical application of knowledge.
aimThe objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a simulated patient interaction protocol in enhancing the clinical skills and confidence of 57 third-year dental students during their initial patient interactions, as well as its impact on achieving the learning outcomes of a one-semester semiology course.
methodsUsing a mixed-methods quasi-experimental design, the study employed actors highly trained as simulated patients in four structured simulation sessions, conducted alongside students' first five clinical sessions. The evaluation of the simulated patient protocol included pre- and post-intervention quantitative perception questionnaires and qualitative focus group interviews. Further, we also compared Mini-CEX learning outcomes clinical scores of the participating students' clinical work, with three historical cohorts (2017 N = 78, 2018 N = 72, and 2019 N = 64) without the simulation intervention, examining student perceptions, and tracking skill progression across encounters.
resultsThe intervention group achieved significantly higher overall Mini-CEX grades compared to the historical cohorts (p > 0.0001). Students also reported statistically significant improvements in self-assessed patient interview and examination skills, along with increased confidence. Skill progression analysis demonstrated overall improvement, though with varying trajectories across eight different learning outcomes from the semiology course. Qualitative feedback further supported these findings, highlighting the value of simulated experiences and enhanced self-assessment.
conclusionsIntegrating simulated patient protocols alongside students' initial clinical work in dental education is highly beneficial, reinforcing both clinical and communicative skills while boosting confidence. This approach helps to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical patient care, significantly improving skills, reducing stress, and easing the transition from classroom learning to real-world clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.