Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41392717›Full record

ArticleJournal of personality2026

(In)congruence Between Justice Beliefs and Justice Experiences Predicts Adolescents' Prosocial Behaviors: Response Surface Analysis.

Ruoxuan Chen, Ningning Feng, Shuang Li, Wenjie Zhai, Lijuan Cui

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruoxuan ChenShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5324-9588
Ningning FengShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4973-4817
Shuang LiShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Wenjie ZhaiNingbo No. 3 High School, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Lijuan CuiShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-5708

Funding

Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China 19ZDA357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLiterature shows that justice beliefs and justice experience (peer victimization) shape adolescent prosociality. However, how adolescents react to the (in)congruence between justice beliefs and justice experiences in peer environments remains unclear.

methodsWe utilized response surface analysis to examine how belief-experience justice (in)congruence affects adolescents' prosocial behaviors.

resultsStudy 1 with a cross-sectional design (N = 2963, M

conclusionThese findings demonstrate that even in unjust peer environments, adolescents' justice beliefs are resilient enough to guide them toward current prosocial actions, which yet would fade over time.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorCrime VictimsSocial BehaviorSocial JusticeAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePeer Groupadolescentbelief in a just worldgenderpeer victimizationprosocial behaviorsRSA

Identifiers

PMID41392717
PMCPMC13540320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.