ArticleVeterinary surgery : VS2026
Evaluation of the rate of residual polystomatic sublingual acinar tissue without tunneling dorsal to the digastricus using a ventral or ventrolateral approach in cats.
Article in Veterinary surgery : VS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the rate of residual polystomatic sublingual acinar tissue if tunneling dorsal to the digastricus muscle and dissection to the sublingual caruncle is not performed during mandibular-sublingual sialadenectomy in cats. STUDY
designCadaveric study. SAMPLE POPULATION: A total of 10 feline cadavers.
methodsMandibular-sublingual sialadenectomy was performed bilaterally in 10 feline cadavers using a ventral or ventrolateral approach in a randomized fashion. Salivary ducts were dissected as far rostral as possible with retraction of the masseter and digastricus muscles until they traveled dorsal to the digastricus muscle, where a ligature was applied. The position of the lingual nerve was identified. Following tunneling, dissection continued rostrally to the sublingual oral mucosa, where ducts were excised. Histology of dissected tissue rostral to the ligature was performed.
resultsHistology identified evidence of salivary acinar tissue in 13/19 (68.4%) specimens - 7/10 (70.0%) of specimens obtained with the ventral approach and 6/9 (66.7%) of those obtained with the ventrolateral approach (p > .99). In all cases, the lingual nerve was identified with retraction of the masseter and digastricus muscles without tunneling.
conclusionTunneling dorsal to the digastricus muscle exposed additional polystomatic salivary acinar tissue in most cases. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Tunneling dorsal to the digastricus via a ventral or ventrolateral approach may decrease the rate of polystomatic sublingual acinar tissue being left in situ in clinical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.