Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41392528›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2026

Degradation of an ultrasonically welded device for surgical suture holding.

Joseph P Crolla, Elliott Farrell, Lauren E J Thomas-Seale, Justin Beyers, Manoj Ramachandran, Martyn Snow, Simon D Mifsud, Duncan E T Shepherd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph P CrollaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Elliott FarrellOsteoWeld Surgical Ltd, Worcestershire, UK.
Lauren E J Thomas-SealeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3959-6513
Justin BeyersBonutti Technologies, Effingham, IL, USA.
Manoj RamachandranThe Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Martyn SnowThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Simon D MifsudOsteoWeld Surgical Ltd, Worcestershire, UK.
Duncan E T ShepherdDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2810-7075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A biodegradable ultrasonically welded device has for the first time been developed for in-body sutures that eliminates the need for surgical knotting. The device comprises two parts that fit together, with a suture inserted between them. Ultrasonic welding is then used to secure the suture by welding the two parts together. The device was manufactured from three biodegradable polymers: Poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide) [PLDLA]; Poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) [PLGA]; Poly(L-lactide) [PLLA]. All devices were degraded through immersion in phosphate buffer solution at a temperature of 37°C ± 2°C. Knotted sutures on their own were also subject to degradation testing. The devices and knotted sutures were mechanically tested at week zero and after 1, 3 and 6 weeks of degradation. Mechanically testing was undertaken to measure the pull-out strength of sutures from the device. PLGA is not suitable for the device, where a significant reduction in failure force was seen after 3 weeks of degradation. By week 6 the mean failure force (±SD) for PLGA was 74.9 ± 23.4 N, which was significantly less than the use of a suture knot on its own, with a mean failure force of 153.2 ± 37.2 N. PLDLA and PLLA were found to be promising materials, with only a small reduction in mean failure force after 6 weeks of degradation. At week 6 there was no significant difference between the mean failure force of PLDLA, PLLA or the suture knot, with mean failure forces of 152.6 ± 15.0, 128.8 ± 35.0 and 153.2 ± 37.2 N, respectively.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaSuturesSuture TechniquesMaterials TestingPolyestersPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerPolyestersPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymerpoly(lactide)degradationmechanical testingPLDLAPLGAPLLAsutureultrasonic welding

Identifiers

PMID41392528
PMCPMC12811503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.