Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41392470›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Evaluation of the Wisconsin Gait Scale in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis and Spastic Hemiplegia.

Agnieszka Guzik, Andżelina Wolan-Nieroda, Pawel Kiper, Błażej Cieślik, Sara Federico, Carlos Luque-Moreno, Mariusz Drużbicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Agnieszka GuzikInstitute of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum of the University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4582-4383
Andżelina Wolan-NierodaInstitute of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum of the University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0188-4755
Pawel KiperHealthcare Innovation Technology Lab, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-5734
Błażej CieślikHealthcare Innovation Technology Lab, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7275-7860
Sara FedericoHealthcare Innovation Technology Lab, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Carlos Luque-MorenoDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5209-3382
Mariusz DrużbickiInstitute of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum of the University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4511-8419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Existing clinical tools do not comprehensively assess gait patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) across all planes or account for spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters. This study investigated the feasibility of the Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS), originally designed to evaluate hemiparetic gait after stroke, in individuals with the spastic hemiplegic subtype of MS. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 30 patients with the spastic hemiplegic subtype of MS. The WGS-based assessment of participants' gait was performed twice, by 3 independent raters. The results of the 2 measurements reported by the 3 raters were compared to determine intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. The WGS scores were also compared with results of clinical tools: the 10-Meter Walk Test, the 2-Minute Walk Test, and the Timed Up and Go Test, to determine the concurrent criterion validity of the WGS. RESULTS A comparison of the scores assigned by the same rater during measurement 1 and measurement 2 showed excellent agreement in each case, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) equal to or higher than 0.991. Likewise, there was excellent agreement between the scores awarded by the 3 raters, both in measurement 1 and measurement 2, with ICCs of 0.988 and 0.978, respectively. The analyses showed very strong and significant correlations (P<0.001) between the mean scores in the WGS and all the clinical tests applied in this study to assess gait. CONCLUSIONS The findings show excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and confirm the concurrent criterion validity of the WGS in patients with hemiplegic MS.

Indexed as

GaitGait AnalysisHemiplegiaMultiple SclerosisMuscle SpasticityAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID41392470
PMCPMC12764159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.