ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the influence of astringent compounds on oral lubrication and the protective role of proline-rich proteins.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative herbal oil formulation as a pre-prosthetic mucosal conditioner: a prospective controlled cytological study on the degree of keratinization in edentulous ridge mucosa before and after Its topical application.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Trial
- Extraction method-dependent structure-function relationships of Astragali complanati semen protein: Implications for its application as a novel plant protein ingredient.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Elucidating the astringency perception mechanism of protocatechuic acid, a key astringent component in black rice, based on polyphenol-salivary protein interaction.Current research in food science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Astringency, characterized by dryness and roughness in the mouth, is a major challenge for the acceptance of plant-based protein-rich foods. The mechanisms behind this sensation, particularly the role of mucins and the oral epithelium, remain unclear. This study investigates the impact of tannins, specifically epigallocatechin gallate (EgCG), on oral lubrication and examines the role of MUC1 protein in the lubrification and potentially in the astringency perception. The protective effect of proline-rich proteins (PRPs) is also explored. In vitro tribological tests were performed on four oral epithelial models expressing different MUC1 isoforms, using a reconstructed mucosal pellicle. A homemade biotribometer measured friction and dissipated energy to assess tannin-mucin interactions. Results confirm that EgCG disrupts epithelial lubrication, increasing frictional forces. However, MUC1 expression, particularly its structure, reduces these effects by preventing tannin aggregation and preserving lubrication. PRPs also enhance lubrication by binding tannins, limiting their interaction with mucins. This study highlights the roles of MUC1 and PRPs in oral lubrication in the presence of tannins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.