ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Cascade counselling and testing. Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interdisciplinary management and genetic evaluation of pediatric cancer predisposition syndromes: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Mainstreaming genetic testing in community oncology settings.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Exploring the impact on intrafamilial support systems when newborn screening programmes contact parents with an initial screen positive result.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Patients' and family members' experiences with cascade testing for Lynch syndrome in the USA: a qualitative interview study.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- The Genetic Landscape of Diabetes Mellitus: Lessons from Monogenic and Polygenic Forms.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing genomic medicine: Guidelines, risk scores, and disease discovery.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Family Leaders Navigate Burden to Communicate Risk during Cascade Screening after Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young.Public health genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cascade testing (CT) is an effective instrument for identifying an index patient's relatives at high risk of a heritable condition enabling informed decision-making on preventive interventions and reproductive choice. However, CT remains underutilised and faces barriers. Discussions are ongoing on how to optimise informing family members and testing uptake in a responsible manner. The European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) contributes to this debate and provides recommendations based on an ethical analysis of when CT is justified, or may be less compelling, considering proportionality and the judicious use of finite resources. ESHG underscores the strong consensus regarding the 'moral architecture' of CT in cases of a high risk of serious, avoidable harm. In such cases, a more active approach towards CT is suggested, including a more directive approach in counselling, more active support for the proband, direct contacting, and balancing confidentiality when this is necessary to avoid a high risk of serious harm, taking account of national regulations and jurisdictions. In contrast, more caution is advised in more complex cases where the balance of benefits and harms of CT is less clear, such as when penetrance is low, and actionability or medical treatment is limited. This more cautious approach does not call for directivity, direct contact or the relaxing of medical confidentiality. The focus, then, shifts to cascade counselling, rather than cascade testing. In some cases, CT may not be proportional or appropriate given the balance between benefits and harms, also in view of available resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.