ArticleThe oncologist2026
Advanced ampullary cancer: post-hoc analysis of the ABC-01, ABC-02, and ABC-03 clinical trials.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ampullary carcinoma (AC) is a rare malignancy. It is often classified within biliary tract cancers (BTC) but lacks dedicated treatment guidelines. This post-hoc analysis evaluated outcomes of patients with advanced AC enrolled in the ABC-01, ABC-02, and ABC-03 clinical trials to provide reference data for future studies. All patients with advanced AC formed the "Descriptive cohort," while those AC treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine (CisGem) comprised the "CisGem-treated cohort." Among 534 trial participants, 28 (5.24%) had AC, and 17 received CisGem. The median age was 63.93 years, and 75.00% were male. Most patients had metastatic disease at baseline (89.29%). Median follow-up for the CisGem-treated cohort was 10.23 months (95% CI 5.98-14.43). The objective response rate was 23.52%, and disease control was achieved in 58.82% of patients. Estimated median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.98 months (95% CI, 6.86-8.44) and 11.76 months (95% CI, 5.94-14.88), respectively, comparable to outcomes in other BTCs. No reliable prognostic or predictive factors for PFS, OS, or ORR were identified, likely reflecting the small sample size. This analysis underscores the rarity of advanced AC and the challenges in recruiting adequate numbers for dedicated trials. While CisGem remains an appropriate standard-of-care regimen, modest survival outcomes highlight the need for improved therapies. Molecular profiling has revealed potentially actionable alterations, including HER2 amplification and KRAS mutations, supporting precision oncology approaches. This study provides the most comprehensive reference dataset to date for advanced AC treated with CisGem and emphasizes the importance of international collaboration and molecularly guided research to improve outcomes in this rare malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.