ArticleNature communications2025
Identification of a deep-branching lineage of algae using environmental plastid genomes.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into the Phylogeny and Enigmatic Mitochondrial Biology of Eustigmatophyte Algae From Over 50 Newly Sequenced Organellar Genomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Nucleomorph phylogenomics suggests a deep and ancient origin of cryptophyte plastids within Rhodophyta.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- ChloroScan: Recovering Plastid Genome Bins From Metagenomic Data.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Charting the landscape of organellar genome evolution in eustigmatophyte algae.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Water mass specific genes dominate the Southern Ocean microbiome.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Experimental insights in taxon-specific functional responses to droughts in glacier-fed stream biofilms.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Global metagenomics reveals plastid diversity and unexplored algal lineages.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Identification of a deep-branching lineage of algae using environmental plastid genomes.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Protists with Uncertain Phylogenetic Affiliations for Resolving the Deep Tree of Eukaryotes.Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine algae underpin entire ocean ecosystems. Yet algae in culture poorly represent their large environmental diversity, and we have a limited understanding of their convoluted evolution by endosymbiosis. Here, we perform a phylogeny-guided plastid genome-resolved metagenomic survey of Tara Oceans expeditions. We present a curated resource of 660 new non-redundant plastid genomes of environmental marine algae, vastly expanding plastid genome diversity within major algal groups, including many without closely related reference genomes. Notably, we recover four plastid genomes, including one near-complete, forming a deep-branching plastid lineage of nano-size algae that we informally name leptophytes. This group is globally distributed and generally rare, although it can reach relatively high abundance in the Arctic. A near-complete mitochondrial genome showing strong co-occurrence with leptophyte plastids is also recovered and assigned to this group. Leptophytes encompass the enigmatic plastid group DPL2, one of the very few known plastid groups not clearly belonging to major algal groups and previously known only from 16S rDNA sequences. Comparative organellar genomics and phylogenomics indicate that leptophytes are sister to haptophytes, and raise the intriguing possibility that cryptophytes acquired their plastids from haptophytes. Collectively, our study demonstrates that metagenomics can reveal hidden organellar diversity, and improve models of plastid evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.