ArticleTranslational neurodegeneration2025
Positive modulation of sigma-1 receptor: a new weapon to mitigate disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Translational neurodegeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is characterised by degeneration of motor neurons, leading to muscle weakness and progressive paralysis. Currently, no treatment is available to halt or reverse the progression of the disease. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, accumulation of unfolded proteins and inflammation are interconnected key actors involved in ALS. A potent therapeutic strategy would be to find molecules that break this vicious circle leading to neuronal dysfunction and death. Targeting sigma-1 receptor (S1R) could meet this objective, as this chaperone protein modulates many cell survival mechanisms. So far, the impact of S1R activation in ALS has been studied using specific agonists and mostly on the SOD1 mutation that represents only 2% of patients. In the present study, the impact of two different S1R activators, the reference agonist PRE-084 and the positive modulator OZP002, was compared on two key ALS genes: TDP43 and C9orf72.
methodsThe dissociation of S1R from Binding immunoglobulin Protein (BiP) was determined using ELISA. OZP002 toxicity was compared to PRE-084 on zebrafish larvae with increasing concentrations. The efficacy of OZP002 and PRE-084 was evaluated on the locomotor escape response of zebrafish expressing mutant TDP43 or one C9orf72 toxic dipeptide. Their effects on NRF2 target gene expression were studied by qPCR. The beneficial effect was further examined on the locomotor performances of TDP43
resultsOZP002 is a positive modulator of S1R, that increases the dissociation of the S1R-BiP complex induced by orthosteric agonists. S1R activation by both OZP002 and PRE-084 restored the locomotor response of ALS zebrafish expressing either TDP43 or one C9orf72 toxic dipeptide. The neuroprotection was due at least in part to the NRF2 cascade stimulation but not with a direct interaction. More importantly, OZP002 and PRE-084 prevented locomotor defects and degeneration of spinal motor neurons in TDP43
conclusionsWe here emphasize the therapeutic value of S1R activation in mitigating ALS pathology. Additionally, we show that the positive modulators pave the way for the development of new S1R-activating compounds for ALS treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.