ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Evaluating chromatographic techniques for the aroma profiling of kombucha.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oak (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kombucha is a fermented beverage made from the addition of a symbiotic community of bacteria and yeast (SCOBY) to a sugary base tea. Despite the odors associated with kombucha, few studies have examined its chemical aroma profile. The mixture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from tea and its fermentation is typically examined using one-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOFMS). More complex samples benefit from the higher resolution and separation capacity of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS), which separates analytes based on their affinity for two distinct stationary phases. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of GC-TOFMS to GC×GC-TOFMS, to use VOC data to differentiate between kombucha products, and to establish an understanding of the VOCs originating from tea versus microorganisms. Samples were taken from 12 sources including two SCOBYs, one starter tea, and eight kombucha teas and analyzed using GC-TOFMS and GC×GC-TOFMS. GC-TOFMS detected 127 analytes across 15 compound classes while GC×GC-TOFMS detected 182 analytes across 17 compound classes. The enhanced separation power of GC×GC-TOFMS allowed for the resolution of coelutions that occurred in GC-TOFMS data. Statistical techniques including principal component analysis (PCA), principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), Fisher ratio, and fold change were applied to the VOC data. Locally produced products contained simple esters and acids while commercial brands contained terpenes and aromatic compounds. This work builds on the overall aim of linking VOC data from microbes and tea with the flavor profile of fermented foods as examined by advanced analytical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.