Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41392029›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A rank ordering and analysis of nine resilience competencies demonstrates the special importance of thought management in maintaining resilience.

Robert Epstein, Sofia Godoy, Ning Wang, Amanda Newland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert EpsteinAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, 92084, USA. re@aibrt.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7484-6282
Sofia GodoyAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, 92084, USA.
Ning WangAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, 92084, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2293-0194
Amanda NewlandAmerican Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, Vista, CA, 92084, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5106-2824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resilience has long been known to involve both innate personality characteristics and learned competencies. In the present study, we measured nine trainable competencies that empirical studies suggest are associated with resilience, and then we rank-ordered those competencies according to how well they predicted several desirable, self-reported life outcomes. We did so by analyzing data obtained from a diverse convenience sample of 5279 English-language speakers (mean age 30.5) from 104 countries (47.7% from the U.S.) who took a new online test of resilience. Participants were first asked various demographic and criterion questions and then took the 81-item, Likert-scale test. The competencies were: Copes Effectively with Past Traumas, Develops Mental and Physical Toughness, Maintains Advantageous Relationships, Manages Emotions Constructively, Manages Stress Effectively, Manages Thoughts Constructively, Practices Assertiveness, Seeks to Grow and Improve, and Solves Problems Effectively. The test had high internal-consistency reliability, and total scores were good predictors of whether someone had ever been in therapy, had ever been hospitalized for a mental health problem, was currently in therapy, had ever been diagnosed with a mental illness, as well as of happiness, personal success, professional success, and self-reported level of resilience. Test scores for people who reported having had resilience training were significantly higher than test scores for people who had no such training. Regression analyses showed that the resilience competency that best predicted desirable outcomes was Manages Thoughts Constructively. Unfortunately, participants scored relatively poorly on this competency (59.5%), while scoring highest on Maintains Advantageous Relationships (72.9%). A small effect was found for gender, with males outscoring females by 0.5%. Effects were also found for race/ethnicity, country, sexual orientation, educational level, parental status, employment status, marital status, and age. The study supports the value of a competencies approach to understanding resilience and calls special attention to the important role that thought management techniques may play in resilience.

Indexed as

Competency testsEpstein resilience inventoryERIOnline testsPsychological testsResilience

Identifiers

PMID41392029
PMCPMC12783855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.