Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41391751›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2026

Interpreting Deep Learning-Based Prediction of the BRAF V600E Mutation Using Diagnostic Whole Slide Images in Skin Cutaneous Melanoma.

Vibha R Rao, Vy Nguyen, Thuy L Phung, Shrey S Sukhadia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vibha R RaoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Vy NguyenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Thuy L PhungDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Shrey S SukhadiaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Electronic address: shrey.sukhadia@dartmouth.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) models have shown promise in predicting molecular alterations directly from hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images in a variety of solid tumors, offering a rapid alternative to conventional molecular testing. However, these models often offer limited insight into their decision-making process, undermining transparency and eroding clinical trust. Interpreting model predictions is essential for a meaningful application of DL in clinical pathology. This is showcased by interpreting the outputs of a weakly supervised DL model, XpressO-melanoma, that predicts BRAF V600E mutation status from whole slide images of skin cutaneous melanoma. The morphologic plausibility of the model's segmentations of the tumor regions of interest and their prediction of BRAF V600E status were evaluated and compared against the pathologists' annotations for the same. The work resulted into four interpretation categories that associate model's performance (ie, area under the curve of 0.8 and precision and recall of 0.7) with the regions of interest that revealed meaningful diagnostic patterns as well as those that required annotation refinements. The work coheres with the White House's National AI [Artificial Intelligence] Action Plan that identifies interpretability as a national research priority and paves the way for a human-DL collaboration in clinical pathology for a better translation of DL techniques in clinical pathology in the near future.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMelanomaProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansMutationBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID41391751
PMCPMC12975350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.