ArticleThe American journal of pathology2026
Interpreting Deep Learning-Based Prediction of the BRAF V600E Mutation Using Diagnostic Whole Slide Images in Skin Cutaneous Melanoma.
Article in The American journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An evaluation of pathology foundation models with weakly supervised learning for BRAF mutation prediction in melanoma whole slide images.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models have shown promise in predicting molecular alterations directly from hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images in a variety of solid tumors, offering a rapid alternative to conventional molecular testing. However, these models often offer limited insight into their decision-making process, undermining transparency and eroding clinical trust. Interpreting model predictions is essential for a meaningful application of DL in clinical pathology. This is showcased by interpreting the outputs of a weakly supervised DL model, XpressO-melanoma, that predicts BRAF V600E mutation status from whole slide images of skin cutaneous melanoma. The morphologic plausibility of the model's segmentations of the tumor regions of interest and their prediction of BRAF V600E status were evaluated and compared against the pathologists' annotations for the same. The work resulted into four interpretation categories that associate model's performance (ie, area under the curve of 0.8 and precision and recall of 0.7) with the regions of interest that revealed meaningful diagnostic patterns as well as those that required annotation refinements. The work coheres with the White House's National AI [Artificial Intelligence] Action Plan that identifies interpretability as a national research priority and paves the way for a human-DL collaboration in clinical pathology for a better translation of DL techniques in clinical pathology in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.