ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Optimising Sleep Stage Detection Using a Minimal Non-EEG Physiological Signal Set and Deep Learning.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic sleep stage classification is essential for enabling non-invasive, at-home monitoring. However, current methods often rely on electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and ad-hoc development approaches that limit reproducibility. We present a reproducible engineering framework for a deep learning model based on the U-Net architecture that classifies sleep into five stages (Wake, N1, N2, N3 and REM) or four (Wake, Light Sleep, Deep Sleep and REM) using only three easily acquired physiological signals: oxygen saturation (SpO), heart rate (HR) and abdominal respiratory effort (AbdRes). In contrast to most previous studies, our model provides sleep stage predictions on a per-second basis, thus overcoming the limitations associated with fixed 30-s epochs. The model was trained on the Sleep Heart Health Study-Visit 2 (SHHS2) dataset and externally validated on the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Optimisation of the model was achieved via Keras Tuner with the Hyperband algorithm. The study achieved weighted F1-scores of 68% (five-stage) and 71% (four-stage) with Cohen's Kappa of 0.61 and 0.67 on SHHS2, with consistent performance on MESA. These results demonstrate strong generalisation and suggest that this lightweight, EEG-free approach offers a practical path towards scalable, clinically relevant sleep monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.