ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2026
Balancing strength and sterility: An in vitro assessment of the mechanical and antibacterial properties of bone cement loaded with various antibiotics.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to determine the antimicrobial efficacy and mechanical strength of antibiotic-loaded cement samples in which daptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam agents were mixed at different doses and to investigate the differences between agents and between doses. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe prepared standardized bone cement samples incorporating vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem at concentrations ranging from 0.625 to 15%. Samples underwent six-week phosphate-buffered saline immersion simulating physiological conditions. Mechanical testing employed four-point bending analysis following ISO 5833 standards. Antimicrobial efficacy was assessed using liquid microdilution against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa over 21 days.
resultsAll antibiotics demonstrated strong negative correlation between concentration and mechanical strength (r=-0.883 to -0.914, p<0.001). Critical threshold emerged at 5% antibiotic concentration, above which mechanical integrity was significantly compromised. Daptomycin and meropenem maintained superior mechanical properties at effective antimicrobial concentrations. At 2-g doses, daptomycin achieved significantly higher strength than piperacillin-tazobactam and teicoplanin (p=0.021). All antibiotics except low-dose piperacillin-tazobactam maintained complete antimicrobial efficacy throughout 21-day testing. Electron microscopy revealed increased porosity, which correlated with reduced mechanical strength, particularly in piperacillin-tazobactam and teicoplanin groups.
conclusionAntibiotic selection significantly impacts both mechanical and antimicrobial properties of bone cement. Daptomycin and meropenem offer optimal balance of antimicrobial efficacy and mechanical integrity. These findings provide evidence-based guidelines for antibiotic selection in resistant infection management while maintaining structural requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.