ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2026
OPTIModel scoring for metastatic bone tumors: A data-driven tool for surgical planning and prognosis.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the predictive accuracy and clinical applicability of the OPTIModel Scoring System in Turkish patients with long bone diaphyseal metastases and to compare its survival predictions and surgical recommendations with real-world outcomes. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween April 2013 and June 2021, a total of 108 patients (52 males, 56 females; mean age: 64.5±10.6 years; range, 45 to 83 years) with histologically confirmed metastatic bone disease affecting the diaphysis of long bones and who underwent surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The OPTIModel Scoring System was applied to estimate survival and guide surgical planning. The prognostic accuracy of the model was statistically analyzed. The patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on their predicted survival.
resultsThe most common primary tumors were breast (24.1%), lung (23.1%), and multiple myeloma (13.0%). The femur (46.3%) was the most frequently affected site. The OPTIModel-predicted median survival was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9-12.1), comparable to the real-world median survival of 13 months (95% CI: 10.8-15.2). Agreement between OPTIModel's surgical recommendations and real-world procedures was substantial (kappa [κ]=0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.85, p<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference between predicted and real-world survival distributions (p=0.126). The ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve [AUC] of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.52-0.70), indicating moderate prognostic accuracy.
conclusionThe OPTIModel Scoring System demonstrated substantial agreement with real-world surgical decisions and moderate accuracy in survival prediction for Turkish patients with metastatic long bone diaphyseal tumors. While the model provides valuable insights for clinical decision-making, further refinements incorporating emerging oncological advancements and biomarker-based risk stratification are needed. Future multi-ethnic validation studies are essential to enhance its applicability in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.