ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2026
Causal associations of specific immunoglobulin G N-glycosylation subtypes with osteoporosis: A two-sample Mendelian randomization.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to examine whether genetically predicted immunoglobulin G (IgG) N-glycosylation patterns (IGPs) affect osteoporosis risk using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn a collaborative effort involving the Medical Research Council (MRC) Human Genetics Unit and the FinnGen consortium, we conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to explore the relationship between 77 IGPs (8,090 samples) and osteoporosis (438,872 samples). Utilizing the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method as our primary analytical tool, we delved into these complex genetic associations. To further substantiate our findings, we employed additional complementary methods such as MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode. Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO), MR-Egger, Cochran's Q, and leave-one-out methods, were used to test the core MR assumptions and validate the robustness of the results. This multi-faceted approach allowed us to detect underlying causal relationships with greater confidence.
resultsThe IGP4 exhibited a protective effect against osteoporosis with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.95, p=0.012). In contrast, IGP45 demonstrated a modest risk increase with an OR of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01-1.19, p=0.021). Similarly, the results of the present MR study suggest that IGP56 also showed a protective trend, with an OR of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.96, p=0.006). To confirm our findings, we conducted rigorous sensitivity analyses utilizing MR-PRESSO, MR-Egger, Cochran's Q, and leave-one-out methods. These analyses revealed no evidence of heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy, thereby reinforcing the robustness and reliability of our findings.
conclusionOur study results indicate that IgG45 contributes positively to osteoporosis, whereas IgG4 and IgG56 exhibit a negative correlation. Nonetheless, additional research is crucial to understand their mechanisms and devise broader preventive strategies for osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.