SynthesisSchizophrenia bulletin2026
Relative Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Antipsychotics and the Combination for People with First Episode Psychosis: A Two-Study Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data.
Synthesis in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is little head-to-head data comparing cognitive behavior therapy for psychosis (CBTp) and antipsychotic medication (APs). However, several recent trials have been conducted in first episode psychosis. We report a pre-specified individual participant data (IPD) pooled analysis utilizing data from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with similar designs to examine relative effectiveness. STUDY
designThe outcomes were psychiatric symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale: PANSS) and recovery (Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery: QPR) at 6 months. One-stage and two-stage IPD meta-analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle. Serious adverse events are also summarized. STUDY
resultsTwo RCTs were included in the pooled IPD analysis which provided 136 participants. For PANSS total at 6 months, the one-stage meta-analysis found no evidence of a difference between CBTp alone and APs alone (mean difference 2.58, 95% CI, -2.83 to 7.98; P-value 0.35) and CBTp alone compared with APs plus CBTp (MD -5.91; 95% CI, -12.14 to 0.31; P-value 0.063). For APs alone compared to CBTp plus APs there was evidence of a difference (MD -8.49; 95% CI, -14.65 to -2.33; P-value 0.007) favoring the combined treatment. For user-defined recovery (QPR), there was a difference favoring CBTp plus APs in comparison to both CBTp alone (P-value 0.029) and APs alone (P-value 0.026), but no difference between the monotherapies (P-value 0.91). The most common serious adverse events were psychiatric hospital admissions.
conclusionsCognitive behavior therapy for psychosis and APs did not differ in their effects on symptoms or recovery, but there were suggestions that the combined treatment may be superior. A definitive RCT is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.