Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41391108›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2026

Relational Therapies for People Who Hear Voices: Operationalisation and Current Status of an Emergent Group of Psychological Therapies.

Neil Thomas, Thomas Ward, Eleanor Longden, Imogen H Bell, Rachel M Brand, Mads J Christensen, Louise B Glenthøj, Mar Rus-Calafell, Mark Hayward

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Neil ThomasCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-6361
Thomas WardInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-5755
Eleanor LongdenPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich Hospital, Prestwich M25 3BL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3046-9697
Imogen H BellCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7567-0517
Rachel M BrandCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, VIC 3122, Australia.
Mads J ChristensenPsychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, North Denmark Region, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0008-2788-5642
Louise B GlenthøjVIRTU Research Group, Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3621-8450
Mar Rus-CalafellDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Digital Psychotherapy, Ruhr University Bochum, 44787 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2293-3875
Mark HaywardR&D Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton BN3 7HZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6567-7723

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the Ministry of Research and Education 3.2-1210962-GBR-SKP, awarded by MRCAustralian Government National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2015133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent theme in the development of psychological interventions for hearing voices (auditory verbal hallucinations) has been the emergence of a group of overlapping approaches increasingly referred to as relational therapies: Relating Therapy (RT), Talking with Voices (TwV), and AVATAR Therapy (AT). STUDY

designCollaborative discussion among a group of researchers involved in developing these interventions combined with a systematic literature search were used to review this new genre, aiming to develop an agreed operationalisation; and identify common and distinctive aspects; potential mechanisms; and collective research directions. STUDY

resultsRelational therapies for voices can be operationalised as those that "consider patterns of interaction, and/or the relational dynamics between hearer and voice, as targets for therapeutic change, and use an experiential process of dialogue with identities associated with voices as a primary therapeutic method." Key differences involve the type of experiential hearer-voice dialogue used (ie, role-play chair work, direct dialogue with voices, and recreations of voice hearing using a computerised avatar), plus varying emphasis on models of interpersonal relating, broader relationships, and meaning encapsulated within voice-hearing experiences. AT has been found efficacious in several randomised controlled trials, with RT supported by evidence from two trials, and a multicentre trial for TwV underway. Mechanism domains include hearer-voice relating; habituation; threat and safety appraisals; and reformulation and integration of experiences.

conclusionsCommon features and mechanisms can be identified across the relational therapies. Key future directions include considering what works for whom; how therapy influences voice phenomenology; the role of relational models; and implementation.

Indexed as

HallucinationsInterpersonal RelationsPsychotherapyPsychotherapy, GroupSchizophreniaHumansauditory verbal hallucinationsavatar therapypsychosispsychotherapyrelating therapyschizophreniatalking with voicesvirtual realityvoice dialogue

Identifiers

PMID41391108
PMCPMC12809787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.