ArticleAnimal cognition2025
Stress in the spotlight: impacts of stress on learning and memory in a cichlid fish.
Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stress has been shown to both enhance and inhibit learning, which requires memory formation and memory retention. To date, the question of how stress influences learning and memory retention has been especially well studied in rodents and primates. Here, we expand our understanding of how stress influences memory formation and retention across vertebrates using the African cichlid fish, Neolamprologus pulcher. Fish were randomly assigned to either a control group or a stressed treatment group (with repeated chasing) and then trained to learn a foraging task, where they had to first learn to move a single disc off a food tray and then learned to lift a particular-coloured disc to receive the food reward. More unstressed (control) fish learned the final foraging task compared to the stressed fish although we did not detect a difference in the number of trials taken to reach the learning criteria or the number of mistakes between stressed and unstressed fish. Once the fish had learned the foraging task, we tested their memory for the task after 12, 24 and 48 days without reinforcement. We show that approximately 80% of the fish, regardless of treatment, remembered the task after 12 days, and 55% of the fish tested remembered even after 48 days. When we compared across all the memory trials, the stressed fish overall showed more memory compared to the control fish. Our results provide a memory decay curve and show that stress dampened learning while enhancing memory, thus expanding our understanding of fish cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.