Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390962›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2026

Employee background-check policies in long-term care facilities in the United States.

Gulrukh Mehboob, Brian Kaskie, Hari Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian KaskieDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Hari SharmaDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-8545

Funding

Improving Quality of Care for Persons with Dementia in Nursing Homes – Evaluation of the National Background Check ProgramR21AG082047 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SHARMA, HARI · 2023 to 2024
$322k
National Institute of Aging R21AG082047NIA NIH HHS R21 AG082047NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesEmployee background checks can help protect older adults in long-term care facilities. The National Background Check Program (NBCP) offers federal support to strengthen employee background-check systems. Yet, regulations on provider requirements, disqualifying offenses, and administrative processes differ across states. We examine differences between NBCP (N = 27) and non-NBCP (N = 23) states across three domains: (1) types of LTC providers required to conduct background checks, (2) disqualifying offenses considered by each state, and (3) processes used to administer background checks. We also assess regulatory changes across these domains from 2005 to 2024 across all 50 states. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted policy surveillance of state regulations on employee background-check programs applicable to individuals seeking work at long-term care facilities. Our sample includes all 50 states, with 27 receiving an NBCP grant. We assess current regulations across three policy domains and review how these regulations have evolved since 2005, when the NBCP pilot program was initiated.

resultsNBCP states have expanded background-check regulations to include a broader range of long-term care providers and disqualifying offenses following the grant. However, minimal differences were observed between the two groups in background check processes such as fingerprinting and registry reviews. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: While many NBCP states have adopted measures like disqualifying offenses and RAP back systems, their overall impact on hiring practices, F-tags, and quality of care remains uncertain.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHomes for the AgedLong-Term CareNursing HomesAgedHumansOrganizational PolicyUnited StatesAbuseCriminal background checksNursing facilitiesRegulations

Identifiers

PMID41390962
PMCPMC13017305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.