ArticleThe Gerontologist2026
Employee background-check policies in long-term care facilities in the United States.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Effect of National Background Check Program on Nursing Home Deficiency Citations.Health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesEmployee background checks can help protect older adults in long-term care facilities. The National Background Check Program (NBCP) offers federal support to strengthen employee background-check systems. Yet, regulations on provider requirements, disqualifying offenses, and administrative processes differ across states. We examine differences between NBCP (N = 27) and non-NBCP (N = 23) states across three domains: (1) types of LTC providers required to conduct background checks, (2) disqualifying offenses considered by each state, and (3) processes used to administer background checks. We also assess regulatory changes across these domains from 2005 to 2024 across all 50 states. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe conducted policy surveillance of state regulations on employee background-check programs applicable to individuals seeking work at long-term care facilities. Our sample includes all 50 states, with 27 receiving an NBCP grant. We assess current regulations across three policy domains and review how these regulations have evolved since 2005, when the NBCP pilot program was initiated.
resultsNBCP states have expanded background-check regulations to include a broader range of long-term care providers and disqualifying offenses following the grant. However, minimal differences were observed between the two groups in background check processes such as fingerprinting and registry reviews. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: While many NBCP states have adopted measures like disqualifying offenses and RAP back systems, their overall impact on hiring practices, F-tags, and quality of care remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.