Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390946›Full record

SynthesisAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2026

Meta-Analysis: High anti-HBs Titers are Associated with Significantly Reduced Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation During Rituximab Treatment.

Shiva Poola, MaryKate Kratzer, Kerry Sewell, Zikun Yang, Hans L Tillmann

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shiva PoolaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University/ECU Health Medical Center, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
MaryKate KratzerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University/ECU Health Medical Center, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Kerry SewellResearch Librarian for the Health Sciences, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0405-3789
Zikun YangDepartment of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Hans L TillmannDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University/ECU Health Medical Center, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a serious complication in patients receiving chronic immunosuppression. Anti-CD20 agents such as Rituximab are considered high risk for HBV reactivation (> 10%); therefore, antiviral prophylaxis is recommended for all anti-HBc positive patients. Some studies have suggested that patients with resolved HBV infection and higher hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titer have a higher level of protection against reactivation.

aimThe purpose of this study was to systematically review the role of anti-HBs titer on HBV reactivation in patients on rituximab while not on antiviral therapy/prophylaxis.

methodsWe systematically reviewed all studies that discussed HBV reactivation in patients on rituximab therapy with resolved HBV infection, defined as HBsAg negative and anti-HBc positive, which discussed anti-HBs titer. The search was conducted in PubMed, Embase via Elsevier, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL inclusive July 2025. We evaluated the incidence of HBV reactivation from cohort studies that described anti-HBs categorically based on anti-HBs titer: 'negative' (titer < 10 iU/L), '10-100 iU/L', or '> 100 iU/L'. Meta-analysis statistics describe the proportion and risk difference for different anti-HBs levels.

resultsThe overall reactivation rate was 12.6%. There was a significant difference in HBV reactivation depending on titer: anti-HBs negative 27.3% (51/195) (20.0%-36.0%), titer < 100 iU/L 13.8% (47/379) (8.8%-20.8%), and titer > 100 iU/L 3.5% (8/339) (1.8%-6.9%).

conclusionsThose with anti-HBs titer > 100 iU/L can be considered lower risk for HBV reactivation and may not require antiviral therapy, but monitoring with initiation of antiviral therapy if titer falls below 100 iU/L.

Indexed as

Hepatitis BHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B virusRituximabVirus ActivationHepatitis B Surface AntigensHumansHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B Surface AntigensRituximabanti‐HBs titerhepatitis B reactivationhepatitis B surface antibody titerreactivationrituximab

Identifiers

PMID41390946
PMCPMC12904191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.