ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
The Silent Face of Chronic Hepatitis B: Biopsy-Supported Fibrosis Detection and the Reliability of Non-Invasive Scores (FIB-4, APRI) in Inactive, Gray Zone, and Immune-Tolerant Cases.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance of Serum-Based Non-Invasive Fibrosis Scores Compared with Liver Biopsy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the non-invasive fibrosis scores Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) in predicting liver fibrosis among patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in immune-tolerant, inactive, and gray zone phases. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective cross-sectional study included 230 patients with CHB, as determined by laboratory and clinical criteria, and who underwent liver biopsy. Patients were grouped based on FIB-4 and APRI fibrosis scores of <3 and ≥3. The FIB-4 and APRI scores were calculated, and their diagnostic accuracy was assessed, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 44.4±12.2 years, and 53.9% were female. A total of 37.4% (86/230) of the patients met the criteria for treatment. Both FIB-4 (1.53±0.90 vs 0.91±0.55, P=0.003) and APRI (0.44±0.23 vs 0.29±0.15, P=0.001) scores were significantly higher in patients with fibrosis score ≥3. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.70 (cut-off >1.06) for FIB-4 and 0.68 (cut-off >0.38) for APRI. Both scores had a negative predictive value of 87%. The difference between AUC values was not statistically significant (P=0.80). CONCLUSIONS FIB-4 and APRI are helpful non-invasive tools for ruling out advanced fibrosis in CHB patients. However, due to their limited diagnostic power, they should be considered as supportive tools rather than definitive alternatives to liver biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.