ArticleScientific reports2025
Magnetic field sensing of 3D printed Halbach arrays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper investigates magnetic field amplification in Halbach arrays. A Halbach array, composed of permanent magnets, is arranged to produce a strong magnetic field on one side and a weak field on the other. This configuration has numerous scientific and engineering applications. The literature review surveys representative implementations. In this work, we propose and validate a cost-effective approach for designing and fabricating Halbach magnet arrays. Specifically, in our experiments, we employ a low-cost Hall-effect sensor to measure the Halbach array's magnetic flux density. Hall-effect sensors are well suited for measuring magnetic fields owing to their accuracy, ease of integration, low cost, and simplicity. Thus, analytical expressions for the magnetic flux density are derived from the magnetic scalar potential using the magnetostatic approximation to Maxwell's equations and a Fourier-series expansion. We then determine and compare the magnetic flux density through experimental measurements, numerical simulations, and analytical calculations. Numerical simulations are performed using the open-source Python package Magpylib, followed by an exponential regression analysis of both experimental and simulated data. These procedures can be implemented without resorting to costly full three-dimensional magnetostatic simulations or specialized laboratory equipment and may be suited for imperfect physical models by inclusion of experimentally-fitted adjustment proportionality factor ξ. Notably, the maximum relative error between the simulation and experimental results is approximately 11% for the Halbach array with large size permanent magnets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.