ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a diagnostic key tool for biliary atresia: feasibility, safety and accuracy in neonates with cholestatic liver disease.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biliary atresia (BA) is a rare condition in newborns characterised by inflammation and obliteration of bile ducts, leading to cirrhosis. Early diagnosis and treatment through Kasai portoenterostomy are crucial for native liver survival. While diagnostic methods include clinical assessment, laboratory tests and imaging, no non-invasive test can definitively rule out BA. Therefore, laparotomy with cholangiography remains the gold standard for diagnosis. This study assesses the feasibility, safety and accuracy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosing BA in newborns. The single-center study was conducted at the University Hospital Tübingen. The study included infants with neonatal cholestasis and suspected BA scheduled for ERCP from 2011 to 2023. We identified 60 jaundiced infants with suspected BA scheduled for diagnostic ERCP with a median age of 50 days. Endoscopy was technically feasible in 58/60 children. In 23 of 58 cases, the bile ducts could not be visualized, suggesting BA. Normal bile duct anatomy was visualized in 35/58 patients, and BA was ruled out. The sensitivity was 100%, the specificity was 92.1%, the negative predictive value was 1.0, and the positive predictive value was 0.87. We did not observe any significant complications post-ERCP (in particular, no bleeding, perforation or pancreatitis). However, in one case (1/60; 2%), protracted weaning after general anesthesia occurred.Conclusions: ERCP is a safe, effective and reliable tool for excluding BA in jaundiced infants. ERCP's integration into the diagnostic algorithm can reduce the burden of surgical diagnostic procedures and enable early diagnosis and portoenterostomy, thereby improving transplant-free survival. What is known - What is new: • Biliary atresia (BA) is the leading cause of obstructive jaundice in neonates, requiring early surgical intervention for optimal outcomes. • Current diagnostic approaches are multimodal but lack a definitive, non-invasive method to exclude BA. • This study demonstrates that ERCP is not only technically feasible in infants as small as 2.6 kg but also highly reliable in excluding BA with 100% sensitivity, 92.1% specificity and a negative predictive value of 1.0. • ERCP is a key diagnostic tool for early exclusion of BA, offering greater diagnostic precision than ultrasound, liver biopsy, or laboratory parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.