Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390878›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2025

Legal implications of AI standard of care integration on patients' informed consent: lessons from surgery.

Mindy N Duffourc, Ronan A Cahill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mindy N DuffourcFaculty of Law, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. mindy.duffourc@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Ronan A CahillDepartment of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

European Union grant 101057321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI integration into clinical practice can introduce novel legal and ethical questions, but there are still important parallels with past medical innovations in how they have been phased into clinical practice and impact consent. This Perspective examines prior legal cases that specifically evaluate consent in connection with use or availability of new surgical technologies to offer valuable insights into how AI integration can impact informed consent during this transition phase.

Identifiers

PMID41390878
PMCPMC12764478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.