ArticleScientific reports2025
Regulatory alignment in FDA expedited pathways for infectious diseases: a decadal review with predictive modeling insights.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating mathematical modelling and artificial intelligence to combat emerging viral syndemics: A systematic review.New microbes and new infections · 2026Review
- Expedited pathway portfolios, trial complexity, and FDA approval timelines in oncology and neurology: A comparative analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite infectious diseases being a significant threat to global health, there are continuing concerns that regulatory authorities do not prioritize therapeutic strategies for infectious diseases with the same urgency as those for oncological or orphan diseases. This study aims to examine the differences in the productivity of drug development and approval procedures between non-infectious and infectious diseases, and to determine the utilization patterns of acceleration programs. All molecules and biologic products approved between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2024 (N = 464) were subject to a cross-sectional study. Drugs@FDA, the Federal Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov were used as sources of data to establish median Clinical Development Time (CDT), Regulatory Approval Time (RAT), and cumulative Regulatory Review Time (RRT). Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare median values (interquartile range, IQR), and chi-square tests were used for proportions. Time-to-event differences were tested using Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank testing, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. Multivariable logistic regression with interaction terms was used to model Priority Review, Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy, and Accelerated Approval, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Of 464 approvals, 65 (14.0%) targeted infectious diseases. Median CDT was 2.76 years (IQR 1.80-4.25) versus 3.46 years (IQR 2.59-4.66; p = 0.003), and median RRT was 3.54 years (IQR 2.58-5.03) versus 4.22 years (IQR 3.24-5.73; p = 0.006) for infectious and non‑infectious drugs, respectively. Nevertheless, infectious agents were approved 58% faster (HR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.15-2.16; p = 0.0047). Infectious disease products were more likely to receive Fast Track (OR = 4.49; 95% CI 2.39-8.70) and Priority Review (OR = 10.69; 95% CI 4.57-29.50) but less likely to obtain Breakthrough Therapy (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.28-0.63) or Accelerated Approval (OR = 0.12; 95% CI 0.016-0.56). Infectious disease treatments outpace non-infectious disease treatments in terms of drug development and approval timelines. Nevertheless, they are less frequently utilized in pathways like Accelerated Approval, which are scientifically less applicable to acute-disease endpoints. Therefore, policy reforms should focus on addressing the underlying economic and scientific barriers to anti-infective innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.