ArticleMalaria journal2025
Practicability of a malaria rapid diagnostic self-test among artisanal gold miners in French Guiana: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extreme rainfall, flooding and malaria in the Sahara: outbreak analysis in Kidal, Mali 2024.Malaria journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn French Guiana (FG), artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) workers represent mobile, hard-to-reach population with high malaria burden. Limited access to rapid diagnostic test (RDT) delays treatment, favours inappropriate use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), and increases transmission and resistance risk. The Malakit intervention enables ASGM workers to self-diagnose and self-treat using RDTs and ACT in a free kit distributed by community health workers (CHWs) after a dedicated training session. This cross-sectional study assessed the praticability of the Bioline Malaria Ag P.f/P.f/P.v RDT among ASGM workers.
methodsDuring Malakit training sessions, an independent observer evaluated participants' knowledge of RDT use, ability to perform self-testing, and ability to interpret results. Each assessment was conducted using a specific tool and quantified with a corresponding sub-score, which were then combined in an overall practicability score. Associations with socio-demographic characteristics were explored using multiple linear regressions.
resultsFrom May to June 2024 forty participants were enrolled in Oiapoque, Brazil. The male-to-female sex ratio was 2.64 and median age 37 years [IQR 31.8-48.8]; 27.5% had no formal education. Following training, mean scores were: knowledge 83.9% [CI95 79.6-88.2], practice 84.6% [CI95 78.3-90.9] without assistance (100% with guidance) and interpretation 77.2% [CI95 70.7-83.8]. All RDTs performed yielded valid result. Correct interpretation rates were 96.0% [CI95 92.4-99.6] for positive strips, 70.0% [CI95 55.2-84.8] for negative strips, and 65.8% [CI95 56.6-75.0] for invalid strips. The overall practicability score was 81.9% [CI95 78.3-85.6]. In practice, all obtained a valid test (presence of the control strip).
conclusionsThe study demonstrated the practicability of malaria self-testing among non-professional users after structured training, with ASGM workers achieving an overall practicability score of 81.9%. Participants successfully performed RDTs (100% valid results with guidance) and accurately interpreted positive results (96.0%). This methodology provides a replicable framework for evaluating self-diagnostic strategies in hard-to-reach populations and supports integration of community-based malaria diagnosis into elimination programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.