Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390786›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of liquid and gel platelet rich plasma from apheresis and buffy coat in wound healing.

Chiara Marraccini, Gaia Gavioli, Cecilia Catellani, Ilaria Ferrigno, Agnese Razzoli, Margherita Genitoni, Barbara Iotti, Erminia Di Bartolomeo, Roberto Baricchi, Lucia Merolle and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chiara Marraccini *Transfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Gaia Gavioli *Transfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cecilia CatellaniClinical Immunology, Allergy and Advanced Biotechnologies Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Ilaria FerrignoClinical Immunology, Allergy and Advanced Biotechnologies Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Agnese RazzoliTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Margherita GenitoniTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Barbara IottiTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Erminia Di BartolomeoTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Roberto BaricchiTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Lucia MerolleTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy. lucia.merolle@ausl.re.it.
Stefania CrociClinical Immunology, Allergy and Advanced Biotechnologies Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Davide SchiroliTransfusion Medicine Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) is widely used in wound care and tissue regeneration, yet variability in its preparation and delivery has hindered clinical standardization. This study compares the regenerative potential of PRP formulations derived from apheresis (Aphe PRP) and buffy-coat (BC PRP), in both liquid and gel forms. We characterized the seven-day release profile of platelet-derived effectors and assessed the impact of PRP on key wound-healing cellular processes-proliferation, migration, and differentiation-using keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and microvascular endothelial cell models. Our findings revealed a sustained effector release over seven days, with liquid PRPs showing significantly higher release levels than gels, regardless of PRP source. Aphe and BC PRPs exhibited comparable effects on cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. However, gel PRPs were less effective than liquid PRPs in promoting proliferation and migration, although both forms significantly enhanced regeneration compared to untreated controls. Notably, differentiation effects were similar across all PRP types. These results suggest Aphe and BC PRPs are interchangeable for wound care, with liquid PRPs offering superior regenerative effects in early treatment stages. This study highlights the need for standardized PRP preparation and application protocols to optimize therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

Blood Buffy CoatBlood Component RemovalPlatelet-Rich PlasmaWound HealingCell DifferentiationCell MovementCell ProliferationFibroblastsGelsHumansKeratinocytesGels

Identifiers

PMID41390786
PMCPMC12783151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.