ArticleNPJ vaccines2025
Adenoviral vector oropharyngeal spray immunization elicits mucosal immunity and protects against heterologous SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Confirmatory, Dual Center Nonhuman Primate Study on the Efficacy of Novel Oropharyngeal Spray Immunization With an Adenoviral Vector Vaccine Against RSV-Important Lessons Learned.Journal of medical primatology · 2026Article
- Trained immunity-based mucosal immunotherapies for preventing respiratory infections: a translational, evidence-graded appraisal of platforms, populations, and the protection-immunopathology balance.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mucosal immunity may be required to prevent the ongoing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 emerging variants of concern. To define the most efficient way to induce protective mucosal immunity, we compared three different forms of mucosal antigen exposure in mRNA pre-immunized rhesus macaques. Two vaccine groups received an oropharyngeal spray immunization with either an adenoviral vector or a live-attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (LAV). A third group was infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant as a comparator group representing the exposure history of most humans. Profound levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA antibodies and mucosal T cell responses in the bronchoalveolar lavage next to systemic IgG antibodies were induced after the adenoviral vector boost and the delta infection, but not after LAV immunization. Consequently, these two groups were better protected against a challenge infection with an immune-escape variant of the Omicron lineage EG.5.1.1 showing almost no upper and lower respiratory tract infection. The adenoviral vector vaccine would be a promising candidate for booster vaccinations to interrupt ongoing viral transmission and could generate similar levels of protection as a natural encounter with heterologous SARS-CoV-2.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.