Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effects of personalized strength training on isokinetic muscle strength and balance ability among fencers with chronic ankle instability.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating the effects of personalized strength training on isokinetic muscle strength and balance ability in fencers with chronic ankle instability (CAI), focusing on functional outcomes and rehabilitation efficacy. Twenty-one fencers with CAI were randomly assigned to three groups: a control group (CG, n = 7), a standardized strength training group (SG, n = 7), and a personalized strength training group (PG, n = 7). During the six-week intervention, training sessions were performed three times per week. Isokinetic muscle strength was assessed at 30°/s and 120°/s with concentric and eccentric ankle eversion. Balance ability was measured using the single-leg stance (with eyes open and closed) and Y-balance tests. Functional performance was evaluated using the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). The personalized strength training group presented significant improvements in eccentric eversion peak torques at 30°/s (p < 0.001) and 120°/s (p = 0.004) and the dynamic control ratio (DCR) at 30°/s (p = 0.001) and 120°/s (p = 0.012). In terms of balance ability, this group demonstrated apparent improvements in the single-leg stance test with eyes closed (p = 0.000) and a trend toward improvement in dynamic balance in the Y-balance test. Additionally, this group showed a highly significant increase in CAIT scores (p < 0.001), indicating enhanced functional stability. By comparison, no evident improvements were observed in the control and standardized strength training groups. Personalized strength training is more effective than standardized programs in improving isokinetic muscle strength, balance ability, and functional stability in fencers with CAI. The findings suggest that incorporating personalized strength training into rehabilitation protocols can enhance recovery efficiency and injury prevention among athletes with CAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.