Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390737›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Cost-effective non-additive GWAS across 2329 diseases in 500,349 individuals.

Ivan Molotkov, Mitja Kurki, FinnGen, Aarno Palotie, Mark J Daly, Mykyta Artomov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ivan MolotkovThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mitja KurkiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
FinnGen
Aarno PalotieInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2527-5874
Mark J DalyInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-8752
Mykyta ArtomovThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. mykyta.artomov@nationwidechildrens.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-8764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug candidates supported by genetic evidence are more likely to succeed in clinical trials, with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) providing a key source of such evidence. Standard GWAS approaches assume additive effects of alleles on the phenotype, but non-additive models have also successfully identified novel associations across various traits. Despite their potential, the large-scale application of non-additive GWAS across thousands of phenotypes in biobanks has been limited by high computational costs. To address this challenge, we present a method that leverages the correlation between additive and non-additive p-values to prioritize variants likely to reach genome-wide significance in non-additive analyses. Applied to the FinnGen dataset comprising 500,349 individuals and 2329 phenotypes, this method reduces computational costs by three orders of magnitude while retaining nearly all true non-additive associations, identifying 781 novel loci missed by additive GWAS. We report fine-mapping and colocalization with 571 datasets for novel loci, uncovering likely causal variants and potential insights into biological mechanisms.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAllelesCost-Benefit AnalysisGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID41390737
PMCPMC12808137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.